From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GSoC 2010][RESEND] Completing Nested VMX
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:37:47 -0300
Message-ID: <20100405163747.51a805c4@redhat.com>
References: <t2s52d4a3891004051134l2db72259sf3af8abbaf1f0f21@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	agraf@suse.de
To: Mohammed Gamal <m.gamal005@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45901 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756092Ab0DETh6 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:37:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <t2s52d4a3891004051134l2db72259sf3af8abbaf1f0f21@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:34:26 +0200
Mohammed Gamal <m.gamal005@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
> I'm interested in adding nested VMX support to KVM in GSoC 2010 (among
> other things). I see that Orit Wasserman has done some work in this
> area, but it didn't get merged yet. The last patches were a few months
> ago and I have not seen any substantial progress in that front ever
> since.
> 
> I wonder whether the previous work can be used as a starting ground
> for any future effort? What is missing from it? What are the current
> limitations of that implementation? And how can it be extended?
> 
> And within the scopr of GSoC, what do you think the achievments of
> such a project should be?

 Alex, weren't you involved in nested VMX support too?