From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What changed since kvm-72 resulting in winNT to fail to boot
 (STOP 0x0000001E) ?
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 08:27:26 +0300
Message-ID: <20100502052726.GZ10044@redhat.com>
References: <4BDB3847.60107@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
 <4BDB3F63.60900@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
 <hrh514$gf3$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <4BDC651B.8020101@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Thomas Mueller <thomas@chaschperli.ch>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33024 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754040Ab0EBF1r (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 2 May 2010 01:27:47 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BDC651B.8020101@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 09:30:03PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >file=winnt.raw,if=ide,boot=on" ?
> 
> Um, that's equivalent, no?
> 
boot=on is not needed and does more harm than good with ide interface.

--
			Gleb.