From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Roedel, Joerg" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: SVM: Allow EFER.LMSLE to be set with nested svm Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 17:16:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20100505151615.GD7515@amd.com> References: <1273068285-3105-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1273068285-3105-5-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4BE184E3.1010508@redhat.com> <20100505150406.GF14542@8bytes.org> <4BE18993.50306@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Joerg Roedel , Marcelo Tosatti , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BE18993.50306@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 11:06:59AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/05/2010 06:04 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > You can roughly check > > for it using the svm cpuid bit. > > Doesn't it kill cross-vendor migration? Enabling Nested SVM kills it anyway, so this is not an issue. AFAIK the feature is not present on Intel CPUs. Joerg