From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-kvm] device-assignment: add config fd qdev property
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 14:10:30 -0700
Message-ID: <20100519211030.GL28275@x200.localdomain>
References: <20100519190041.GK28275@x200.localdomain>
 <4BF4398B.50902@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29288 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750711Ab0ESVKj (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 May 2010 17:10:39 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BF4398B.50902@codemonkey.ws>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

* Anthony Liguori (anthony@codemonkey.ws) wrote:
> An fd as a qdev property seems like a bad idea to me.

What is your concern?

> I'm not sure I have a better suggestion though.

Anything else requires inventing some new commandline options and monitor
comnmands (-pcidevice anyone? ;-).  I'm not sure the benefit, esp with
hopes of moving to uio.

thanks,
-chris