* [PATCH] KVM: svm: Fix erratum 383 check for 32-bit hosts
@ 2010-05-26 7:11 Jan Kiszka
2010-05-26 7:45 ` Roedel, Joerg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-05-26 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity, Marcelo Tosatti; +Cc: kvm, Joerg Roedel
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
This overflow should have left the check broken behind for 32-bit hosts.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 3c03c36..fd32791 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static bool is_erratum_383(void)
/* Bit 62 may or may not be set for this mce */
value &= ~(1ULL << 62);
- if (value != 0xb600000000010015)
+ if (value != 0xb600000000010015ULL)
return false;
/* Clear MCi_STATUS registers */
--
1.6.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: svm: Fix erratum 383 check for 32-bit hosts
2010-05-26 7:11 [PATCH] KVM: svm: Fix erratum 383 check for 32-bit hosts Jan Kiszka
@ 2010-05-26 7:45 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-05-26 7:56 ` Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roedel, Joerg @ 2010-05-26 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: Avi Kivity, Marcelo Tosatti, kvm
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:11:17AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
> This overflow should have left the check broken behind for 32-bit hosts.
The check itself should work but it gives a compile warning for me (at
least in my small userspace test I did ;) Good catch, thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 3c03c36..fd32791 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static bool is_erratum_383(void)
> /* Bit 62 may or may not be set for this mce */
> value &= ~(1ULL << 62);
>
> - if (value != 0xb600000000010015)
> + if (value != 0xb600000000010015ULL)
> return false;
>
> /* Clear MCi_STATUS registers */
> --
> 1.6.0.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: svm: Fix erratum 383 check for 32-bit hosts
2010-05-26 7:45 ` Roedel, Joerg
@ 2010-05-26 7:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-26 8:00 ` Roedel, Joerg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2010-05-26 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roedel, Joerg; +Cc: Avi Kivity, Marcelo Tosatti, kvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1167 bytes --]
Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:11:17AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>
>> This overflow should have left the check broken behind for 32-bit hosts.
>
> The check itself should work but it gives a compile warning for me (at
> least in my small userspace test I did ;) Good catch, thanks.
To my understanding, the test degraded to value != 0x00010015. That may
not have the intended effect, no?
Jan
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 3c03c36..fd32791 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ static bool is_erratum_383(void)
>> /* Bit 62 may or may not be set for this mce */
>> value &= ~(1ULL << 62);
>>
>> - if (value != 0xb600000000010015)
>> + if (value != 0xb600000000010015ULL)
>> return false;
>>
>> /* Clear MCi_STATUS registers */
>> --
>> 1.6.0.2
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: svm: Fix erratum 383 check for 32-bit hosts
2010-05-26 7:56 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2010-05-26 8:00 ` Roedel, Joerg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roedel, Joerg @ 2010-05-26 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: Avi Kivity, Marcelo Tosatti, kvm
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:56:43AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:11:17AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >>
> >> This overflow should have left the check broken behind for 32-bit hosts.
> >
> > The check itself should work but it gives a compile warning for me (at
> > least in my small userspace test I did ;) Good catch, thanks.
>
> To my understanding, the test degraded to value != 0x00010015. That may
> not have the intended effect, no?
I tested this with a small test program in userspace (compiled with
gcc -m32) and the check actually works. But I get a compile warning
because the constant is too large for type long. So I think the check
should work in the 32 bit kernel too.
Joerg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-26 8:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-26 7:11 [PATCH] KVM: svm: Fix erratum 383 check for 32-bit hosts Jan Kiszka
2010-05-26 7:45 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-05-26 7:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-26 8:00 ` Roedel, Joerg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox