From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: raw disks no longer work in latest kvm (kvm-88 was fine)
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 06:34:48 -0400
Message-ID: <20100529103448.GB16311@infradead.org>
References: <4BF8ED0C.2070004@nagafix.co.uk> <4BF91844.8030903@redhat.com> <4BF936BB.5000401@nagafix.co.uk> <4BF9391A.1080302@redhat.com> <4BF93EF5.5090106@nagafix.co.uk> <4BF945E4.8080209@redhat.com> <4BF9554D.3000100@nagafix.co.uk> <AANLkTimL6bE4XxxKDBq-n4PQo_gYD7utNF_nVU_068ce@mail.gmail.com> <4C00E1A3.50109@nagafix.co.uk> <AANLkTikL_3uDvel-bcwslgElk27ly3Sz9cH3JyPwSaDD@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:47469 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754080Ab0E2Kev (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 29 May 2010 06:34:51 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikL_3uDvel-bcwslgElk27ly3Sz9cH3JyPwSaDD@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I would expect that aio=native is faster but benchmarks show that this
> isn't true for all workloads.

In what benchmark do you see worse results for aio=native compared to
aio=threads?