From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] use unfair spinlock when running on hypervisor. Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:17:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20100603151730.GE4166@basil.fritz.box> References: <20100601163807.GA11880@basil.fritz.box> <4C053ACC.5020708@redhat.com> <20100601172730.GB11880@basil.fritz.box> <4C05C722.1010804@redhat.com> <20100602085055.GA14221@basil.fritz.box> <4C061DAB.6000804@redhat.com> <20100603042051.GA5953@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100603103855.GG6822@laptop> <20100603120450.GH4035@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100603123832.GL6822@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Avi Kivity , Andi Kleen , Gleb Natapov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, mtosatti@redhat.com To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100603123832.GL6822@laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:38:32PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > And they aren't even using ticket spinlocks!! I suppose they simply don't have unfair memory. Makes things easier. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.