From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] These are my first patches to the kernel Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:33:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20100613133321.GA6319@pengutronix.de> References: <4C149194.2060507@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: "K.de Jong" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:51000 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752482Ab0FMNdZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:33:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > So I am going to continue making patches like these > and become more familiar with the whole kernel. Better concentrate on the drivers/staging-directory for that. Such patches = are very welcome there, which may be not so true for the rest of the kernel. You can probably find a couple of mail-threads stating the pros and cons. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwU3iEACgkQD27XaX1/VRvMBQCgtdUQwBiECpCWCzdhxEMEHAPP A4kAoJ5Z5ebp7eqYDcLP6d0l8TFbIuqx =Ew+b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--