Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9] make kvm mmu shrinker more aggressive

Dave Hansen
2010-06-22T16:32:39Z

On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 11:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > That changes a few things. I bet all the contention we were seeing was
> > just from nr_to_scan=0 calls and not from actual shrink operations.
> > Perhaps we should just stop this set after patch 4.
> >
>
> At the very least, we should re-measure things.

Sure. I'll go back to the folks that found this in the first place and
see how these patches affect the contention we were seeing.

-- Dave