From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Really lazy fpu Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:01:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20100616090155.GK4240@const> References: <1276441427-31514-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4C187C22.2080505@redhat.com> <4C187DF1.9030007@zytor.com> <4C188527.9040305@redhat.com> <20100616083941.GA27151@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Avi Kivity , Peter Zijlstra , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner , Suresh Siddha , Linus Torvalds , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker , Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , Eric Dumazet , Mike Galbraith , "H. Peter Anvin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100616083941.GA27151@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar, le Wed 16 Jun 2010 10:39:41 +0200, a =E9crit : > in the long run most processes will be using the FPU due to SIMM = =20 > instructions. I believe glibc already uses SIMM instructions for e.g. memcpy and friends, i.e. basically all applications... Samuel