From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Bareiro Subject: Re: Loss of network connectivity with high load Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:19:06 -0300 Message-ID: <20100616101906.GD28074@defiant.freesoftware> References: <20100615210038.GA28074@defiant.freesoftware> <201006151613.03906.iggy@theiggy.com> <20100616033643.GB28074@defiant.freesoftware> Reply-To: dbareiro@gmx.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1" To: KVM General Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41781 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757636Ab0FPKTN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:19:13 -0400 Received: from defiant (defiant.freesoftware [10.1.0.65]) by hermes.freesoftware (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAAA5EE for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:17:40 -0300 (ART) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100616033643.GB28074@defiant.freesoftware> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, 16 June 2010 00:36:43 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > There have been a few bugs similar to this reported that should be > > pretty easy to find. Basically, I'd say try 0.12.4, it should have a > > few fixes in this area over 0.12.3. > I was testing with qemu-kvm 0.12.4 but I'm having the same problem. I > re-read the announce about qemu-kvm 0.12.4 sent by Avi, but I didn't > find in it some reference about fixes related to Virtio. >=20 > If there's anything else I can try, please tell me. I found some references to similar problems: http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/3117-virtio-net-crashing-(stop-sending-tra= ffic) http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg26033.html http://marc.info/?l=3Dkvm&m=3D126564542625725&w=3D2 In particular, I note the patches provided by Tom Lendacky and Herbert Xu. Are these patches applied to qemu-kvm 0.12.3 or 0.12.4? If so, it could be a regression? Thanks in advance for your reply. Regards, Daniel --=20 Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Lenny - Linux user #188.598 --zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwYpRoACgkQZpa/GxTmHTfQyQCfUk+8tdrpqovg6us6fLSA0YdE QwkAnjuQfLKqdNw9MtKvlhSBJsGT9r3X =e4K/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1--