From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: RFC qdev path semantics (was: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce canonical device hierarchy string) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:40:39 +0100 Message-ID: <201006161140.41862.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <20100614054923.879.33717.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alex Williamson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chrisw@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kraxel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com To: Markus Armbruster Return-path: Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:35076 "EHLO mail.codesourcery.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752821Ab0FPKkt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:40:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > * Else, use TYPE.NUM, where TYPE is derived from the bus type, and NUM > is the bus number, as above. > > ### Paul proposes to either drop TYPE.NUM (and require drivers to > provide bus names), or make NUM count separately for each bus type. I revised this proposal: Drop the .NUM part, and require drivers provide a bus name if TYPE would result in ambiguous names. Paul