Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for June 15

Aurelien Jarno
2010-06-17T05:15:46Z

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:41:53AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > KVM/qemu patches
> > - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
> > - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
> > - will slow down patch writers
> > - will make it easier for patch reviewers
>
> What is the qemu patch review policy anyway? There are no
> "Reviewed-by:" included in the actual commits, and the requirement
> for a positive review also seem to vary a lot, up to the point that
> some commiters commit code that has never hit a public mailing list
> before.
>

This is indeed something very useful that should be encouraged.
Depending on the patch and the persons that have reviewed/acked it, I
commit some patches only after a very quick look.

--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net