public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:44:46 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629114446.GB26369@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C29A9CC.2080508@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:07:40PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> 
> 
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> >> +
> >> +	if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> >> +		return;
> >> +
> >> +	if (sp->role.direct)
> >> +		return direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, sptep);
> > 
> > Can never happen.
> > 
> 
> Marcelo,
> 
> Thanks for your comment. You mean that we can't meet sp->role.direct here?
> could you please tell me why? During my test, it can be triggered.

Ah, for 1->1 emulation, right.

> >> @@ -322,6 +395,7 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
> >>  				     user_fault, write_fault,
> >>  				     dirty, ptwrite, level,
> >>  				     gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
> >> +			FNAME(pte_prefetch)(vcpu, sptep);
> >>  			break;
> >>  		}
> > 
> > 
> > I'm afraid this can introduce regressions since it increases mmu_lock
> > contention. Can you get some numbers with 4-vcpu or 8-vcpu guest and
> > many threads benchmarks, such as kernbench and apachebench? (on
> > non-EPT).
> > 
> 
> The pte prefetch is the fast path, it only occupies little time, for the worst
> case, only need read 128 byte form the guest pte, and if it prefetched success,
> the #PF cause by later access will avoid, then we avoid to exit form the guest,
> and walk guest pte, walk shadow pages, flush local tlb... a lots of work can be
> reduced.
> 
> Before i post this patchset firstly, i do the performance test by using unixbench,
> it improved ~3.6% under EPT disable case.
> (it's in the first version's chagelog)
> 
> Today, i do the kernbench test with 4 vcpu and 1G memory, the result shows it
> improved ~1.6% :-)

OK, nice.

> > Also prefetch should be disabled for EPT, due to lack of accessed bit.
> > 
> 
> But we call mmu_set_spte() with speculative == false, it not touch the accessed bit.

There is no accessed bit on EPT. So the aging code (kvm_age_rmapp)
considers any present translation as accessed. There is no way to
distinguish between actually accessed translations and prefetched (but
unused) ones.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4C2498EC.2010006@cn.fujitsu.com>
2010-06-25 12:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:43   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28  9:49     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/10] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:50   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 10:02     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:13       ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:17         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:06           ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:35             ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:49               ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:04                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  9:13                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:13                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  7:38             ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  7:45               ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29  8:51                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  9:08                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/10] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28  9:55   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 7/10] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_topup_memory_cache_atomic() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 11:17   ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-29  1:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-28 13:04   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-29  8:07     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-29 11:44       ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-06-30  0:58         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 9/10] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-25 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100629114446.GB26369@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox