public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/11] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:39:29 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100630193929.GA4817@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2AFA50.1070502@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:03:28PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> If the mapping is writable but the dirty flag is not set, we will find
> the read-only direct sp and setup the mapping, then if the write #PF
> occur, we will mark this mapping writable in the read-only direct sp,
> now, other real read-only mapping will happily write it without #PF.
> 
> It may hurt guest's COW
> 
> Fixed by re-install the mapping when write #PF occur.

Applied 1, 2 and 4, thanks.

> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> index 28c8493..f28f09d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -325,8 +325,32 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep))
> -			continue;
> +		if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
> +			struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
> +			unsigned direct_access;
> +
> +			if (level != gw->level)
> +				continue;

This will skip the check for the sp at level 1 when emulating 1GB pages
with 4k host pages (where there are direct sp's at level 2 and 1).
Should be > instead of !=.

> +
> +			/*
> +			 * For the direct sp, if the guest pte's dirty bit
> +			 * changed form clean to dirty, it will corrupt the
> +			 * sp's access: allow writable in the read-only sp,
> +			 * so we should update the spte at this point to get
> +			 * a new sp with the correct access.
> +			 */
> +			direct_access = gw->pt_access & gw->pte_access;
> +			if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level - 1]))
> +				direct_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
> +
> +			child = page_header(*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
> +			if (child->role.access == direct_access)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(child, sptep);
> +			__set_spte(sptep, shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
> +			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
> +		}
>  
>  		if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
>  			rmap_remove(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
> -- 
> 1.6.1.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-30 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-30  8:02 [PATCH v3 1/11] KVM: MMU: fix writable sync sp mapping Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30  8:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/11] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30  8:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/11] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 19:39   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-07-01  0:50     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:03       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30  8:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/11] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30  8:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(fetch)() functions Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:05   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30  8:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30  8:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30  8:07 ` [PATCH v3 8/11] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30  8:08 ` [PATCH v3 9/11] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 20:43   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01  1:11     ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:07       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 12:11       ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 12:13         ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:26           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30  8:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30  8:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100630193929.GA4817@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox