From: Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net>
To: KVM General <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Swap usage with KVM
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:12:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100711191227.GD9267@defiant.freesoftware> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100711151257.GA13279@defiant.freesoftware>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5820 bytes --]
On Sunday, 11 July 2010 12:12:57 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I have an installation with Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.4 amd64 with qemu-kvm
> 0.12.3 compiled with the source code obtained from the official site
> of KVM and Linux 2.6.32.12 compiled from source code of kernel.org.
> All this is installed on an HP Proliant DL380 G6 with two Xeon E5530
> quadcore processors and 16 GiB of RAM which has two VMs with the
> following configuration of memory:
>
> Hostname | RAM
> ===============+===============
> Aps4 | 7 GiB
> Leela | 7 GiB
> ===============+===============
> TOTAL | 14 GiB
>
> Initially the host was created with a swap partition of 1 GiB, but
> today we found that the use of swap quickly began to grow
> increasingly. Therefore, as a contingency, we had to hot-add a
> logical volume of 1 GB of swap on the VMHost. Is 'normal' this use of
> memory?
>
> I copy the Nagios Service Log Entries for the VMHost:
>
> Event Start Time Event End Time Event Duration Event/State Type Event/State
> Information
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 06-07-2010 00:00:00 07-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 100% free (956 MB out of 956 MB)
> 07-07-2010 00:00:00 08-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 100% free (956 MB out of 956 MB)
> 08-07-2010 00:00:00 08-07-2010 16:41:43 0d 16h 41m 43s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 100% free (956 MB out of 956 MB)
> 09-07-2010 00:00:00 10-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 99% free (939 MB out of 956 MB)
> 10-07-2010 00:00:00 11-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 79% free (754 MB out of 956 MB)
> 11-07-2010 00:00:00 11-07-2010 07:08:17 0d 7h 8m 17s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 51% free (482 MB out of 956 MB)
> 11-07-2010 07:08:17 11-07-2010 10:41:07 0d 3h 32m 50s SERVICE WARNING (HARD) SWAP WARNING
> - 29% free (272 MB out of 956 MB)
> 11-07-2010 10:41:07 11-07-2010 10:45:57 0d 0h 4m 50s SERVICE CRITICAL (HARD) SWAP
> CRITICAL - 9% free (83 MB out of 956 MB)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm not using qcow2 files. The /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 partition is a
> physical volume that maintains the logical volumes that are used for
> VM's disks.
>
> The Nagios Service Log Entries for VMs shows no excessive use of swap
> in the window of time when the problem occurred in the VMHost:
>
> Aps4:
>
> Event Start Time Event End Time Event Duration Event/State Type Event/State
> Information
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 06-07-2010 00:00:00 07-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 100% free (2850 MB out of 2863 MB)
> 07-07-2010 00:00:00 08-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 98% free (2797 MB out of 2863 MB)
> 08-07-2010 00:00:00 08-07-2010 16:41:43 0d 16h 41m 43s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 99% free (2812 MB out of 2863 MB)
> 09-07-2010 00:00:00 10-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 98% free (2784 MB out of 2863 MB)
> 10-07-2010 00:00:00 11-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (2754 MB out of 2863 MB)
> 11-07-2010 00:00:00 11-07-2010 11:53:38 0d 11h 53m 38s+ SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 100% free (2839 MB out of 2863 MB)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Leela:
>
> Event Start Time Event End Time Event Duration Event/State Type Event/State
> Information
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 06-07-2010 00:00:00 07-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (919 MB out of 956 MB)
> 07-07-2010 00:00:00 08-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (920 MB out of 956 MB)
> 08-07-2010 00:00:00 08-07-2010 16:41:43 0d 16h 41m 43s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (920 MB out of 956 MB)
> 08-07-2010 17:01:36 08-07-2010 17:04:16 0d 0h 2m 40s SERVICE CRITICAL (HARD) Connection
> refused by host
> 08-07-2010 17:04:16 09-07-2010 00:00:00 0d 6h 55m 44s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (921 MB out of 956 MB)
> 09-07-2010 00:00:00 10-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (921 MB out of 956 MB)
> 10-07-2010 00:00:00 11-07-2010 00:00:00 1d 0h 0m 0s SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (921 MB out of 956 MB)
> 11-07-2010 00:00:00 11-07-2010 11:58:29 0d 11h 58m 29s+ SERVICE OK (HARD) SWAP OK -
> 97% free (921 MB out of 956 MB)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Unfortunately I could not take much more data because we had to act
> quickly, but if you need any additional information, please feel free to
> ask.
Has anyone experienced something like this? Avi? I remember late last
year there was a regression in Linux swapping and Rik and Hugh were
working on it. Are you aware of any?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Lenny - Linux user #188.598
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-11 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-11 15:12 Swap usage with KVM Daniel Bareiro
2010-07-11 19:12 ` Daniel Bareiro [this message]
2010-07-11 21:49 ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-02 18:57 ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-02 19:31 ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-02 19:52 ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-02 20:22 ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-02 21:43 ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-27 10:04 ` Swap usage with KVM (and KSM) Daniel Bareiro
2010-08-27 13:42 ` Rik van Riel
2010-07-11 21:05 ` Swap usage with KVM Freddie Cash
2010-07-11 22:08 ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-07-20 15:04 ` Daniel Bareiro
2010-07-20 19:18 ` David Weber
2010-07-22 10:09 ` Daniel Bareiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100711191227.GD9267@defiant.freesoftware \
--to=daniel-listas@gmx.net \
--cc=dbareiro@gmx.net \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox