From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] APIC/IOAPIC EOI callback
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:12:46 +0300
Message-ID: <20100711201246.GA12544@redhat.com>
References: <20100711180910.20121.93313.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <20100711180936.20121.35376.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <4C3A09F3.8010304@redhat.com>
 <1278872784.20397.18.camel@x201>
 <4C3A0DE3.8010806@redhat.com>
 <20100711185456.GA11048@redhat.com>
 <1278876078.20397.79.camel@x201>
 <20100711192330.GA11491@redhat.com>
 <1278878614.20397.128.camel@x201>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pugs@cisco.com, chrisw@redhat.com
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19351 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754101Ab0GKUSX (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:18:23 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1278878614.20397.128.camel@x201>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:03:34PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > What about threaded interrupts?

Just to make the point, imagine a nested virt situation
which uses current kvm device assignment in guest.
Look at the interrupt handler we have there.


-- 
Alex