From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:08:12 -0300 Message-ID: <20100713110812.597d31d0@redhat.com> References: <4C3BED6C.20601@redhat.com> <4C3C0E5C.50902@aurel32.net> <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Aurelien Jarno , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Juan Quintela To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3393 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756775Ab0GMOI2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:08:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C3C1878.2060003@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:40:40 +0300 Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/13/2010 09:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Avi Kivity a =C3=A9crit : > > =20 > >> On 07/12/2010 05:57 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > >> =20 > >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > >>> > >>> > >>> =20 > >> 0.12.n+1 > >> > >> =20 > > I won't be at the KVM call, but I can work on that in the next days= =2E > > > > Basically the stable tree already contains a lot of fixes and we ca= n do > > a call for patches for this release. One week should be enough, so = that > > we can have the release at the end of next week (a few technical da= ys > > are needed in addition). > > =20 >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable= =20 > branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or= =20 > data integrity fixes). I remember someone has stepped in to take that work, but I don't exactl= y remember who.