From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Justin M. Forbes" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM Call agenda for July 13th Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:43:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20100715184328.GA16484@linuxtx.org> References: <4C3C9AF9.30405@codemonkey.ws> <4C3C9BE2.5010200@redhat.com> <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , kvm-devel , Aurelien Jarno , Juan Quintela To: Brian Jackson Return-path: Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:52369 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934066Ab0GOSnh (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:43:37 -0400 Received: by gwj18 with SMTP id 18so635362gwj.19 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201007131219.21649.iggy@theiggy.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:19:21PM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote: > On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:01:22 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 07/13/2010 07:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> I'd like to see more frequent stable releases, at least if the stable > > >> branch contains fixes to user-reported bugs (or of course security or > > >> data integrity fixes). > > > > > > Would you like to see more frequent stable releases or more frequent > > > master releases? > > > > Yes. But in this context I'm interested in stable releases. We have > > bugs reported, fixed, and the fix applied, yet the fixes are unreachable > > to users. > > Especially so since qemu-kvm 0.12-stable hasn't been merged with qemu > basically since 0.12.4 came out. I was trying to help one of the Gentoo > maintainers find post 0.12.4 patches the other day and had to point them to > the upstream qemu stable tree. I have offered to take care of this, but so far I do not have commit access. Justin