From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Check for nested vmrun intercept before emulating vmrun Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:33:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20100802203344.GO23755@8bytes.org> References: <1280760405-22591-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1280760405-22591-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4C56E1B1.4070805@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Joerg Roedel , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C56E1B1.4070805@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/02/2010 05:46 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> This patch lets the nested vmrun fail if the L1 hypervisor >> has not intercepted vmrun. This fixes the "vmrun intercept >> check" unit test. > >> + >> static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm) >> { >> struct vmcb *nested_vmcb; >> @@ -2029,6 +2037,17 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm) >> if (!nested_vmcb) >> return false; >> >> + if (!nested_vmcb_checks(nested_vmcb)) { >> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_code = SVM_EXIT_ERR; >> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_code_hi = 0; >> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = 0; >> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = 0; >> + >> + nested_svm_unmap(page); >> + >> + return false; >> + } >> + > > Don't you have to transfer an injected event to exitintinfo? APM2 seems to be quiet about this. I just tried it out and event_inj still contains the event after a failed vmrun on real hardware. This makes sense because this is no real vmexit because the vm was never entered. Joerg