From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: 2.6.35 hangs on early boot in KVM Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:49:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20100803154901.GF28136@aftab> References: <201008031028.57263.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> <201008031557.04613.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> <201008031617.21418.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> <201008031631.03111.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , KVM list , "hpa@zytor.com" To: Tvrtko Ursulin Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008031631.03111.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org From: Tvrtko Ursulin Date: Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:31:02AM -0400 > > One interesting waning spotted: > > > > include/config/auto.conf:555:warning: symbol value '-fcall-saved-ecx > > -fcall- saved-edx' invalid for ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS > > Copying Peter and Borislav, guys please look at the above warning. I am > bisecting a non-bootable 2.6.35 under KVM and while I am not there yet, it is > close to the hweight commit (cb41838bbc4403f7270a94b93a9a0d9fc9c2e7ea) and I > spotted this warning. That's because you're at a bisection point before the hweight patch but your .config already contains the ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS variable because of the previous bisection point which contained the hweight patch. I think this can be safely ignored. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Registration: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632