From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tvrtko Ursulin Subject: Re: 2.6.35 hangs on early boot in KVM Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:01:05 +0100 Message-ID: <201008031701.06278.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> References: <201008031028.57263.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> <201008031631.03111.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> <20100803154901.GF28136@aftab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Avi Kivity , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , KVM list , "hpa@zytor.com" To: Borislav Petkov Return-path: Received: from mx1.sophos.com ([195.166.81.52]:56017 "EHLO mx1.sophos.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932341Ab0HCQBK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:01:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100803154901.GF28136@aftab> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 03 Aug 2010 16:49:01 Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > Date: Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:31:02AM -0400 > > > > One interesting waning spotted: > > > > > > include/config/auto.conf:555:warning: symbol value '-fcall-saved-ecx > > > -fcall- saved-edx' invalid for ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS > > > > Copying Peter and Borislav, guys please look at the above warning. I am > > bisecting a non-bootable 2.6.35 under KVM and while I am not there yet, > > it is close to the hweight commit > > (cb41838bbc4403f7270a94b93a9a0d9fc9c2e7ea) and I spotted this warning. > > That's because you're at a bisection point before the hweight patch but > your .config already contains the ARCH_HWEIGHT_CFLAGS variable because > of the previous bisection point which contained the hweight patch. > > I think this can be safely ignored. Yep, bisect pointed to another commit so I continued another part of this thread. Thanks for the explanation! Tvrtko Sophos Plc, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, United Kingdom. Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 348 3873 20.