From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Real mode interrupt injection Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:31:33 +0300 Message-ID: <20100816153133.GB21482@redhat.com> References: <1281908823-4505-1-git-send-email-m.gamal005@gmail.com> <4C693ACA.9090702@redhat.com> <4C694821.1020108@redhat.com> <20100816142923.GA21482@redhat.com> <4C694F9C.6040803@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com To: Mohammed Gamal Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36544 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753673Ab0HPPbf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:31:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:23:18PM +0300, Mohammed Gamal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > =9AOn 08/16/2010 05:29 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > >>> I wrote a push_std() that uses ->write_std() instead of > >>> ->write_emulated() and can be used back-to-back. =9ALong term we'= ll > >>> need a write queue but for the short term this will do. > >>> > >> Why not just call writeback() after the emulate_push()? emulate_pu= sha() > >> does it. > > > > Good idea. =9AI'll do that. >=20 > I tried it, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. >=20 It should. Can you post what you've tried? -- Gleb.