From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] kvm test: add monitor_printf Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:48:57 -0300 Message-ID: <20100903164857.GA31666@amt.cnet> References: <20100902233652.853027771@redhat.com> <20100902233712.666073971@redhat.com> <4C80AA43.20904@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28485 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755364Ab0ICQu7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:50:59 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o83Gowpr020964 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:50:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C80AA43.20904@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:56:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 09/03/2010 01:36 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >+static void print_monitor(const char *buf) > >+{ > >+ [...] > >+} > >+ > >+void puts_monitor(const char *s) > >+{ > >+ spin_lock(&mon_lock); > >+ print_serial(s); > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Is this intended? Ouch, no, print_monitor. > > Paolo