From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Add a new API to virtio-pci Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:03:36 +0930 Message-ID: <201009101303.36638.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20100908072859.23769.97363.sendpatchset@krkumar2.in.ibm.com> <201009092144.26484.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: anthony@codemonkey.ws, davem@davemloft.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Krishna Kumar2 Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:34352 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753465Ab0IJDdk (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:33:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:19:33 pm Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote on 09/09/2010 05:44:25 PM: > > Ah, good point. Move the queue index into the struct virtqueue? > > Is it OK to move the queue_index from virtio_pci_vq_info > to virtqueue? I didn't want to change any data structures > in virtio for this patch, but I can do it either way. Yep, it's logical to me. Thanks! Rusty.