From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: Regarding routed networking with KVM Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:16:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20100914121641.GA9206@redhat.com> References: <20100914101537.GB16336@redhat.com> <20100914105122.GD16336@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Rajiv Rajaian Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59015 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751499Ab0INMQo (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:16:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:58:46PM +0530, Rajiv Rajaian wrote: > Thanks for your kind information Daniel. > Consider this scenario > VM1(144.68.100.1) and VM2(144.68.100.2) running on Host1(10.2.0.20) > and Host2(10.2.0.30) respectively. Is it possible to access the VM1 > and VM2 from Host3(10.2.0.100). How to add a static route for this > scenario?? Here I don't need separate subnets for VMs. > All VMs should be in same subnet ie 144.68.100.0/255.255.255.0 > Is there any way to configure this ?? No, in the setup libvirt does, each host must have a separate subnet. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|