From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [KVM timekeeping 10/35] Fix deep C-state TSC desynchronization Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:32:15 -0300 Message-ID: <20100915123215.GC3688@mothafucka.localdomain> References: <1282291669-25709-1-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com> <1282291669-25709-11-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com> <4C8F3C03.50306@siemens.com> <4C904685.9090402@redhat.com> <4C907F3D.6070709@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Zachary Amsden , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , Thomas Gleixner , John Stultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46481 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752448Ab0IOMcg (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:32:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C907F3D.6070709@web.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:09:33AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > In any case, I'll proceed with the forcing of unstable TSC and HPET > > clocksource and see what happens. > > I tried that before, but it did not trigger the issue that kvm-clock > guests no longer boot properly. This only happens if the TSC is marked > unstable. even artificially marked unstable ?