public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Ashdown <pashdown@xmission.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: BCM5708 performance issues
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:01:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101005230159.GA16062@xmission.com> (raw)

I'm running two separate KVM hosts that are showing the same network
performance issue - KVM-guest is 35% slower than non-KVM (or ESXi for that
matter).  I'm wondering if the "Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708" interface is at
fault.  I've tried all sorts of tweaks and configurations and I've only
succeeded in making the network slower.

The first box is running ProxMox 1.6.  The second is Ubuntu 10.04.  The guests
on both boxes are 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04 server installs with virtio.

ProxMox guest:
/usr/bin/kvm -monitor unix:/var/run/qemu-server/104.mon,server,nowait -vnc unix:/var/run/qemu-server/104.vnc,password -pidfile /var/run/qemu-server/104.pid -daemonize -usbdevice tablet -name UbuntuServer -smp sockets=2,cores=2 -nodefaults -boot menu=on -vga cirrus -tdf -k en-us -drive file=/var/lib/vz/images/104/vm-104-disk-2.raw,if=ide,index=3 -drive file=/var/lib/vz/images/104/vm-104-disk-1.raw,if=virtio,index=0,boot=on -m 1024 -net tap,vlan=0,ifname=vmtab104i0,script=/var/lib/qemu-server/bridge-vlan -net nic,vlan=0,model=virtio,macaddr=76:3F:1A:03:6D:6F

Ubuntu guest:
/usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.12 -enable-kvm -m 1024 -smp 1 -name ubutest -uuid c0537369-fffa-9680-2f29-2e0cc0406561 -chardev socket,id=monitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/ubutest.monitor,server,nowait -monitor chardev:monitor -boot c -drive file=/dev/vg/ubutest,if=virtio,index=0,boot=on -net nic,macaddr=52:54:00:35:11:f1,vlan=0,model=virtio,name=virtio.0 -net tap,fd=51,vlan=0,name=tap.0 -chardev pty,id=serial0 -serial chardev:serial0 -parallel none -usb -vnc 0.0.0.0

Netperf looks like this on the Ubuntu host:
 Recv   Send    Send                          
 Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed              
 Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput  
 bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec  

 1048576  16384  16384    10.01     941.62   

This is what I get on the Ubuntu guest for either setup:
 Recv   Send    Send                          
 Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed              
 Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput  
 bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec  

 1048576  16384  16384    10.00     615.65

Thank you for any guidance you can lend.

             reply	other threads:[~2010-10-05 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-05 23:01 Pete Ashdown [this message]
2010-10-06  1:31 ` BCM5708 performance issues Chris Wright
2010-10-06 17:16   ` virtio network performance [was: Re: BCM5708 performance issues] Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101005230159.GA16062@xmission.com \
    --to=pashdown@xmission.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox