From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] use upstream x86 state save/restore code
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:05:01 -0200
Message-ID: <20101024210501.GA12288@amt.cnet>
References: <20101023220524.049191736@amt.cnet>
 <4CC438AE.4010202@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22429 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755983Ab0JXVFc (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:05:32 -0400
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9OL5U19004257
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:05:31 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4CC438AE.4010202@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 10/24/2010 12:05 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> 
> Presumably you did a line-by-line verification that nothing is lost?

Yes, missing parts were sent upstream in the last uq/master pull
request (which is already merged).