From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 26 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:24:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20101026132424.GG26191@redhat.com> References: <4CC68F50.3030505@redhat.com> <4CC6CE77.3030906@codemonkey.ws> <4CC6D1EA.7050706@redhat.com> <4CC6D61E.9060003@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Juan Quintela , kvm-devel , qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26847 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933206Ab0JZNY2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:24:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC6D61E.9060003@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:22:38AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 10/26/2010 08:04 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 10/26/2010 02:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >>On 10/26/2010 03:20 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>> On 10/25/2010 09:51 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > >>>>Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > >>>> > >>> > >>>0.13.1 > >>> > >>>At least two fatal issues: > >>>- vmmouse is broken > >>>- assertion failure in block layer > >> > >>There's actually a fair bit. I'm hoping to also get the hotplug > >>fixes because tose are pretty important IMHO. I don't want to > >>wait too long though. > > > >Also, a new seabios for the SCI level triggered fix. > > You mean: > > commit 6d5a2172f2b76900572107868ec080400c4f615d > Author: Kevin O'Connor > Date: Wed Oct 20 21:59:11 2010 -0400 > > mark irq9 active high in DSDT > > In PIIX4 SCI (irq9) is active high. Seabios marks it so in interrupt > override table, but some OSes (FreeBSD) require the same information to > be present in DSDT too. Make it so. > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov > > If so, what's the impact of it not being there? I wanted to stick Power down from qemu monitor does not work for FreeBSD. > to 0.6.1 for stable-0.13, updating to a git snapshot is going to > pull a lot of things in that would be better to avoid for stable. > We can talk to Kevin about a stable branch but I'd like to > understand what the real impact here is first. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > >> > >>What's the assertion in the block layer? > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646538 > > > >This is qemu-img, so maybe not so critical. I confused this with > >a runtime assertion failure in the block layer, for which a fix > >was merged post rc3. > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Gleb.