From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: KVM devices assignment; PCIe AER? Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:54:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20101026205417.GA20458@redhat.com> References: <20101026183733.GA17477@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Wright , Alex Williamson , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Etienne Martineau Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48946 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756814Ab0JZVA7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:00:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:24:00PM -0700, Etienne Martineau wrote: > ***One of the aspect I'm not clear is the strategy for > device-assignment under KVM? > A) Move to VFIO; [/dev/iommu, /dev/vfio] > B) KVM as a driver for the assigned devices; [sysfs/ ioctls..] > C) No plan for short term > > Alex, Chris, Michael thanks for your reply. > -Etienne We will have to keep supporting B for a long while. -- MST