From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: KVM devices assignment; PCIe AER? Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:17:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20101026221735.GA21520@redhat.com> References: <20101026183733.GA17477@redhat.com> <20101026204208.GV25455@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20101026221558.GZ25455@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Etienne Martineau , Alex Williamson , kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com To: Chris Wright Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45673 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753370Ab0JZWYS (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:24:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101026221558.GZ25455@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:15:58PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > I think we need to register with PCI and provide > > 'pci_error_handlers' callback if we wants to receive AER > > notification. > > Right, and adding more to the existing KVM code which we are hoping to > push to legacy support mode doesn't sound like a great idea. If it's a small patch, I think Avi mentioned that he might consider features too. -- MST