From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] device-assignment: Move PCI capabilities to match
 physical hardware
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:20:38 +0200
Message-ID: <20101112092038.GI7631@redhat.com>
References: <20101112024710.31423.99667.stgit@s20.home>
 <20101112025602.31423.95572.stgit@s20.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chrisw@redhat.com
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50740 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752052Ab0KLJUr (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:20:47 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101112025602.31423.95572.stgit@s20.home>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:56:13PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Now that common PCI code doesn't have a hangup on capabilities
> being contiguous,

Hmm, this comment confused me : there's no requirement of
contigious allocations in current code in pci.c, is there?

-- 
MST