From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] KVM: assigned dev: MSI-X mask support
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:03:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101115080353.GD22248@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201011151548.46490.sheng@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:48:46PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Monday 15 November 2010 15:42:50 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:37:21PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > We can back to them if there is someone really did it in that way.
> > > > > But for all hypervisors using QEmu, I think we haven't seen such
> > > > > kind of behavior yet.
> > > >
> > > > I would rather stick to the spec than go figure out what do BSD/Sun/Mac
> > > > do, or will do.
> > >
> > > Sure, but no hurry for that. It doesn't similar to the API case, so we
> > > can achieve it incrementally.
> >
> > Isn't the proposed way to solve this to move vector address/data
> > handling into kernel too? If yes it does affect the API.
>
> It didn't afffect the API used by this patch. So the code can still be modified
> after later.
Then won't we have to support two APIs, forever?
> --
> regards
> Yang, Sheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-11 7:46 [PATCH 0/7 v4] MSI-X mask support for assigned device Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 7:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] PCI: MSI: Move MSI-X entry definition to pci_regs.h Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 7:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] PCI: Add mask bit definition for MSI-X table Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 17:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-11-15 8:02 ` Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 7:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: Move struct kvm_io_device to kvm_host.h Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 7:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: Add kvm_get_irq_routing_entry() func Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 7:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: assigned dev: Clean up assigned_device's flag Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 7:46 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: assigned dev: MSI-X mask support Sheng Yang
2010-11-12 9:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-12 10:13 ` Sheng Yang
2010-11-12 10:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-12 10:54 ` Sheng Yang
2010-11-12 11:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-15 7:37 ` Sheng Yang
2010-11-15 7:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-15 7:48 ` Sheng Yang
2010-11-15 8:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-11-15 8:22 ` Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 7:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: assigned dev: Big endian support for MSI-X MMIO Sheng Yang
2010-11-11 16:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-12 2:47 ` Sheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101115080353.GD22248@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox