From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: Improve IRQ assignment for device passthrough
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:55:07 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101116165506.GA20186@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1289215310.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:21:44PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Nine patches (yeah, it's getting more and more) to improve "classic"
> device assigment /wrt IRQs. Highlight is the last one that resolves the
> host IRQ sharing issue for all PCI 2.3 devices. Quite essential when
> passing non-MSI-ready devices like many USB host controllers.
>
> As there were concerns regarding the overhead of IRQ masking via the PCI
> config space, I did some micro-benchmarks. Well, the concerns are valid:
>
> disable_irq_nosync: ~600 cycles
> pci_2_3_irq_check_and_mask: ~6000 cycles (EHCI)
> ~22000 cycles (AR9287, with peaks >100000)
>
> Specifically the varying impact of the device like in the Atheros case
> is worrying (this device is actually known to cause horrible latencies
> to the host, but who knows what other devices do). So I decided to go
> with PCI-2.3 masking as default off in the to-be-sent qemu-kvm patch.
> Maybe something to consider vor VFIO as well.
Looks fine to me. Michael, Alex?
Also needs a rebase.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 11:21 [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: Improve IRQ assignment for device passthrough Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: Fix srcu struct leakage Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 17:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-08 17:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM: Switch IRQ subsystem to SRCU Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 10:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 11:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: Clear assigned guest IRQ on release Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 10:58 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 11:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 18:36 ` Alex Williamson
2010-11-10 6:53 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-26 10:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM: Switch assigned device IRQ forwarding to threaded handler Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 12:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM: Refactor IRQ names of assigned devices Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: Save/restore state of assigned PCI device Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 12:35 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 16:41 ` Don Dutile
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM: Clean up kvm_vm_ioctl_assigned_device Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: Document device assigment API Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:27 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 14:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 16:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-11-16 18:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: Improve IRQ assignment for device passthrough Jan Kiszka
2010-11-17 8:25 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101116165506.GA20186@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox