From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kvm: fast-path msi injection with irqfd Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:49:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20101118134921.GD8247@redhat.com> References: <20101117221254.GA8296@redhat.com> <20101118105741.GA31261@redhat.com> <4CE50810.3090502@redhat.com> <20101118111037.GB31261@redhat.com> <4CE51C17.4000108@redhat.com> <20101118130337.GA2254@redhat.com> <20101118131453.GO7948@redhat.com> <20101118132027.GB8247@redhat.com> <20101118133501.GQ7948@redhat.com> <4CE52C83.4090007@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gleb Natapov , Marcelo Tosatti , Xiao Guangrong , Gregory Haskins , Chris Lalancette , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33209 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757899Ab0KRNtf (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:49:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CE52C83.4090007@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:39:15PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/18/2010 03:35 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > >> or something like this. > >Ah so you want to do it only for MSI? For MSI it makes sense. Remember > >though that sometimes destination depend on message itself (specifically > >on delivery mode). > > Yes, broadcast or multicast or lowest priority wouldn't get this treatment. Unless there's a single online VCPU :) > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function