From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:02:54 +0200
Message-ID: <20101128170254.GF12874@redhat.com>
References: <1290012243-6087-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
 <20101123153141.GD25606@redhat.com>
 <4CEBE7F4.9080200@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <4CF1706A.3000507@redhat.com>
 <20101128075404.GF6897@redhat.com>
 <20101128131352.GA12874@redhat.com>
 <20101128131900.GC2187@redhat.com>
 <AANLkTikhrgBJA6GYuFfJy=oda+i6L1Jo-PAOCYgedMfT@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, armbru@redhat.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40866 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753394Ab0K1RDV (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:03:21 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikhrgBJA6GYuFfJy=oda+i6L1Jo-PAOCYgedMfT@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:22:42PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote=
:
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> > > On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> > > >On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> > > >>Anthony, Blue
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it b=
e applied?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten arou=
nd to
> >> > > >review it?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >IOW, last call if you have objections :-)
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers t=
o get
> >> > > it right.
> >> > >
> >> > > But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is ne=
eded?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > The patch creates Openfirmware device path from qdev
> >> > hierarchy. Each element of a device path depends on type of a bu=
s
> >> > the device resides on. You can find various bus bindings here:
> >> > http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/ and main spec is here
> >>
> >> sun.com links have a tendency to disappear nowdays :)
> >> Is this the official location? =A0Aren't bindings part of some sta=
ndard?
> > I think this is official location.
>=20
> I'd suppose some of them are IEEE standards, available for a fee.

I don't think so:
	The IEEE-1275 Open Firmware standard was not reaffirmed by the OFWG an=
d
	has been officially withdrawn by IEEE. Unfortunately, this means it is
	unavailable from the IEEE.=20
--=20
MST