From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:53:42 +0000 Message-ID: <201011291653.42595.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <1290665220-26478-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4CF3D7A0.7010700@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Yoshiaki Tamura , ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, mtosatti@redhat.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Blue Swirl , aliguori@us.ibm.com, avi@redhat.com, psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ananth@in.ibm.com To: dlaor@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:53209 "EHLO mail.codesourcery.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755206Ab0K2QyC (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:54:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4CF3D7A0.7010700@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw > > under Kemari? > > It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration > working w/o Kemari. In addition, last I checked Kemari needs additional > hooks and it will be too hard to keep that out of tree until all devices > get it. That's not what I've been hearing earlier in this thread. The responses from Yoshi indicate that Stefan's summary is correct. i.e. the current Kemari implementation may require per-device hooks, but that's a bug and should be fixed before merging. Paul