public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kiviti <avi@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:59:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101203172954.GC11725@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF9242D.4090007@redhat.com>

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:09:01PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I don't see how that is going to help get the lock
> released, when the VCPU holding the lock is on another
> CPU.

Even the directed yield() is not guaranteed to get the lock released, given its
shooting in the dark?

Anyway, the intention of yield() proposed was not to get lock released
immediately (which will happen eventually), but rather to avoid inefficiency
associated with (long) spinning and at the same time make sure we are not
leaking our bandwidth to other guests because of a naive yield ..

- vatsa



  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-03 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-02 19:41 [RFC PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Rik van Riel
2010-12-02 19:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] kvm: keep track of which task is running a KVM vcpu Rik van Riel
2010-12-03  1:18   ` Chris Wright
2010-12-03 14:50     ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-03 15:55       ` Chris Wright
2010-12-05 12:40       ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-03 12:17   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-03 14:16     ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-05 12:59       ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-02 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function Rik van Riel
2010-12-03  0:50   ` Chris Wright
2010-12-03 18:27     ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-03 19:30       ` Chris Wright
2010-12-03 21:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-03  5:54   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 13:46     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-03 14:45       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 14:48         ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-03 15:09           ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 15:35             ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-03 16:20               ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-03 17:09                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-03 17:29                   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2010-12-03 17:33                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-03 17:45                       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-03 20:05               ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03 21:26             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-03 13:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-03 13:30     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-03 14:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-03 14:06         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-03 14:10           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-03 21:23             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-04 13:02               ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-10  4:34           ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-10  8:39             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-12-10 14:55               ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-08 17:55     ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-08 20:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 20:04         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 22:59         ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-02 19:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] kvm: use yield_to instead of sleep in kvm_vcpu_on_spin Rik van Riel
2010-12-03  2:24   ` Chris Wright
2010-12-05 12:58     ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-05 12:56   ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-08 22:38     ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-09 10:28       ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-09 17:07         ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-11  7:27           ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-02 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Chris Wright
2010-12-05 13:02   ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-10  5:03 ` Balbir Singh
2010-12-10 14:54   ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-11  7:31   ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-11 13:57     ` Balbir Singh
2010-12-13 11:57       ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-13 12:39         ` Balbir Singh
2010-12-13 12:42           ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-13 17:02       ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-14  9:25         ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101203172954.GC11725@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox