From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3] qemu, qmp: convert do_inject_nmi()
 to QObject, QError
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:17:52 -0200
Message-ID: <20101216111752.77757c00@doriath>
References: <4D088F27.8000909@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20101215150911.14e1693f@doriath>
	<4D08F868.5090100@redhat.com>
	<20101215152606.078147ad@doriath>
	<m3aak7ylp6.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<20101215160000.16f85795@doriath>
	<4D09D5EA.7070000@redhat.com>
	<20101216084815.3ca77188@doriath>
	<m3oc8mj5wm.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<4D0A0B00.3070108@redhat.com>
	<20101216110917.646779b7@doriath>
	<4D0A1016.7060408@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	aliguori@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58814 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755532Ab0LPNSL (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:18:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4D0A1016.7060408@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0200
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/16/2010 03:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +0200
> > Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >
> > >  On 12/16/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >  >  >
> > >  >  >   This has the feature of injecting the nmi in just some cpus, although I'm
> > >  >  >   not sure this is going to be desired/useful.
> > >  >
> > >  >  Use case for NMI-ing a subset of the CPUs?
> > >  >
> > >  >  Heck, use case for anything else but "NMI all"?
> > >
> > >  Exactly.
> >
> > Then I think the to-all-cpus argument is better.
> 
> Why have an argument at all?  Always nmi to all cpus.

That's possible too.