From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3] qemu, qmp: convert do_inject_nmi()
 to QObject, QError
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:22:34 -0200
Message-ID: <20101217092234.0e43101d@doriath>
References: <4D088F27.8000909@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20101215150911.14e1693f@doriath>
	<4D08F868.5090100@redhat.com>
	<20101215152606.078147ad@doriath>
	<m3aak7ylp6.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<20101215160000.16f85795@doriath>
	<4D09D5EA.7070000@redhat.com>
	<20101216084815.3ca77188@doriath>
	<m3oc8mj5wm.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<4D0A0B00.3070108@redhat.com>
	<20101216110917.646779b7@doriath>
	<4D0A1016.7060408@redhat.com>
	<20101216111752.77757c00@doriath>
	<4D0B011F.8060502@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65371 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753640Ab0LQLXJ (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:23:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4D0B011F.8060502@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:15 +0800
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On 12/16/2010 09:17 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0200
> > Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Why have an argument at all?  Always nmi to all cpus.
> > 
> 
> I think Avi's suggest is better, and I will use
> "inject-nmi" (without cpu-index argument) to send NMI to all cpus,
> like physical GUI. If some one want to send NMI to a set of cpus, 
> he can use "inject-nmi" multiple times.

His suggestion is to drop _all_ arguments, right Avi?

This will simplify things, but you'll need a small refactoring to keep
the human monitor behavior (which accepts a cpu index).

> I also like "cpu-index", so I have to add another patch for
> coverting current "cpu_index" to "cpu-index".
> 
> Thanks,
> Lai
>