From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikola Ciprich Subject: Re: qemu-kvm-0.13.0 - winsows 2008 - chkdisk too slow Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 14:44:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20110109134413.GC2400@nik-comp.lan> References: <20110106094240.GE17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D259729.2050403@redhat.com> <20110106121857.GG17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25C312.7010008@redhat.com> <20110106135554.GI17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25D3A0.5070104@redhat.com> <20110106153844.GJ17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <20110109123645.GA2400@nik-comp.lan> <4D29AC91.30904@redhat.com> <20110109133655.GB2400@nik-comp.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: KVM list , nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz, "Daniel P. Berrange" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from gwu.lbox.cz ([62.245.111.132]:60768 "EHLO gwu.lbox.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751140Ab1AINo1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2011 08:44:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110109133655.GB2400@nik-comp.lan> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > What are the differences between the host the completes chkdsk and the > > host that fails? Hardware-wise and software-wise. > Software-wise, I'm not aware of any, both nodes use: > - kernel 2.6.36.2 > - qemu-kvm-0.13.0 > - seabios-0.6.0 huh, I noticed now, it's not clean 0.13.0, but 0.13.0 + patches up to 420fe74769cc67baec6f3d962dc054e2972ca3ae. but it's the same on both machines, problematic and nonproblematic. hope it's not problem, sorry for the mess :( n. -- ------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz -------------------------------------