public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kiviti <avi@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	ttracy@redhat.com, dshaks@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC -v5 PATCH 2/4] sched: Add yield_to(task, preempt) functionality.
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:17:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110114174741.GB28632@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110114030357.03c3060a@annuminas.surriel.com>

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 03:03:57AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> 
> Currently only implemented for fair class tasks.
> 
> Add a yield_to_task method() to the fair scheduling class. allowing the
> caller of yield_to() to accelerate another thread in it's thread group,
> task group.
> 
> Implemented via a scheduler hint, using cfs_rq->next to encourage the
> target being selected.  We can rely on pick_next_entity to keep things
> fair, so noone can accelerate a thread that has already used its fair
> share of CPU time.

If I recall correctly, one of the motivations for yield_to_task (rather than
a simple yield) was to avoid leaking bandwidth to other guests i.e we don't want
the remaining timeslice of spinning vcpu to be given away to other guests but
rather donate it to another (lock-holding) vcpu and thus retain the bandwidth
allocated to the guest.

I am not sure whether we are meeting that objective via this patch, as
lock-spinning vcpu would simply yield after setting next buddy to preferred
vcpu on target pcpu, thereby leaking some amount of bandwidth on the pcpu
where it is spinning. Would be nice to see what kind of fairness impact this 
has under heavy contention scenario.

- vatsa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-14 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-14  8:02 [RFC -v5 PATCH 0/4] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Rik van Riel
2011-01-14  8:03 ` [RFC -v5 PATCH 1/4] kvm: keep track of which task is running a KVM vcpu Rik van Riel
2011-01-16 15:17   ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-14  8:03 ` [RFC -v5 PATCH 2/4] sched: Add yield_to(task, preempt) functionality Rik van Riel
2011-01-14 17:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-14 17:47   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2011-01-14 18:29     ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-17 15:53       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-01-14  8:04 ` [RFC -v5 PATCH 3/4] export pid symbols needed for kvm_vcpu_on_spin Rik van Riel
2011-01-16 15:18   ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-14  8:05 ` [RFC -v5 PATCH 4/4] kvm: use yield_to instead of sleep in kvm_vcpu_on_spin Rik van Riel
2011-01-14 17:34 ` [RFC -v5 PATCH 0/4] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Rik van Riel
2011-01-14 21:29 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110114174741.GB28632@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=dshaks@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ttracy@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox