kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: fix rcu usage warning in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs()
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:27:36 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110120152736.GA3922@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D37A603.4040602@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:03:31AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 02:13 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:16:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>> Fix:
> >>>
> >>> [ 1001.499596] ===================================================
> >>> [ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> >>> [ 1001.499601] ---------------------------------------------------
> >>> [ 1001.499604] include/linux/kvm_host.h:301 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> >>> 	......
> >>> [ 1001.499636] Pid: 6035, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.37-rc6+ #62
> >>> [ 1001.499638] Call Trace:
> >>> [ 1001.499644]  [] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5
> >>> [ 1001.499653]  [] gfn_to_memslot+0x8d/0xc8 [kvm]
> >>> [ 1001.499661]  [] gfn_to_hva+0x16/0x3f [kvm]
> >>> [ 1001.499669]  [] kvm_read_guest_page+0x1e/0x5e [kvm]
> >>> [ 1001.499681]  [] kvm_read_guest_page_mmu+0x53/0x5e [kvm]
> >>> [ 1001.499699]  [] load_pdptrs+0x3f/0x9c [kvm]
> >>> [ 1001.499705]  [] ? vmx_set_cr0+0x507/0x517 [kvm_intel]
> >>> [ 1001.499717]  [] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs+0x1f3/0x3c0 [kvm]
> >>> [ 1001.499727]  [] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x6a5/0xbc5 [kvm]
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >>
> >> Ping ...?
> > 
> > Applied this fix. For the make_all_cpus_request optimization, can you
> > show numbers with this new version? Because now there is LOCK# similarly
> > to the spinlock.
> 
> Marcelo,
> 
> Sure :-), there is the simply test result of kernbench:
> 
> Before patch:
> 
> real    5m6.493s                                                                
> user    3m57.847s                                                               
> sys     9m7.115s 
> 
> real    5m1.750s                                                                
> user    4m0.109s                                                                
> sys     9m10.192s       
> 
> 
> After patch:
> real    5m0.140s                                                                
> user    3m57.956s                                                               
> sys     8m58.339s  
> 
> real    4m56.314s                                                               
> user    4m0.303s                                                                
> sys     8m55.774s  

Nice. One disadvantageous side effect for the kvm_vcpu_kick path 
is that it can race with make_all_cpus_request, which is possibly
doing unrelated, slower work (IPI'ing other vcpus, waiting for
response).

Looks ok, but lets wait for more careful reviews before applying.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-20 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12  7:39 [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: fix rcu usage warning in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs() Xiao Guangrong
2011-01-12  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: send IPI to vcpu only when it's in guest mode Xiao Guangrong
2011-01-12  9:54   ` Nadav Har'El
2011-01-12  9:59     ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-12  7:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: make make_all_cpus_request() lockless Xiao Guangrong
2011-01-19  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: fix rcu usage warning in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs() Xiao Guangrong
2011-01-19 18:13   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-20  3:03     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-01-20 15:27       ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2011-01-27  2:35         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-01-27 13:15         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110120152736.GA3922@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).