From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Network performance with small packets
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:02:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20110127.130240.104065182.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20110127193131.GD5228@redhat.com>
	<1296157547.1640.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20110127200548.GE5228@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mashirle@us.ibm.com, steved@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: mst@redhat.com
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59867
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752763Ab1A0VCG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:02:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20110127200548.GE5228@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:05:48 +0200

> Interesting. Could this is be a variant of the now famuous bufferbloat then?

Sigh, bufferbloat is the new global warming... :-/