From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_get_spte_hierarchy Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 13:48:05 -0300 Message-ID: <20110305164805.GB4607@amt.cnet> References: <4D70C569.1030107@cn.fujitsu.com> <4D70C597.4070105@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , LKML , KVM To: Xiao Guangrong Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D70C597.4070105@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 06:57:27PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > Don not walk to the next level if spte is mapping to the large page > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > index b9bf016..10e0982 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c > @@ -3819,7 +3819,8 @@ int kvm_mmu_get_spte_hierarchy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 sptes[4]) > for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, addr, iterator) { > sptes[iterator.level-1] = *iterator.sptep; > nr_sptes++; > - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*iterator.sptep)) > + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*iterator.sptep) || > + is_last_spte(*iterator.sptep, iterator.level)) > break; > } > spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); shadow_walk_okay covers that case.