From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc6: general protection error inside KVM 64 bits guest
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 14:42:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110306124238.GC25565@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=J=G4kUcs4V5q9p5P9Bj3gWgL4NQOoWGnX2GKZ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:40:08AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
> [ was post on LKML but try it here since it's more appropriate ]
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running kernel 2.6.38-rc6 with qemu-kvm 0.12.3.
>
> Doing this inside the guest:
>
> int main(void)
> {
> if (ioperm(0x3e0, 4, 1) < 0) {
> perror("ioperm");
> exit(1);
> }
>
> outb(0, 0x3e0);
> inb(0x3e1);
> printf("exiting succesfully\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> make a general protection error.
>
> Looking for the faulty instruction with gdb and found that's the 'inb'
> instruction the culprit.
>
> Running the same program on the host works fine.
>
> Could anybody tell me what's wrong ?
>
IO permission checking for 64-bit guest in KVM is wrong. The patch bellow
should fix it.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 50ebc32..7ef5b86 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -142,10 +142,8 @@ struct x86_emulate_ops {
int (*pio_out_emulated)(int size, unsigned short port, const void *val,
unsigned int count, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
- bool (*get_cached_descriptor)(struct desc_struct *desc,
- int seg, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
- void (*set_cached_descriptor)(struct desc_struct *desc,
- int seg, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+ bool (*get_cached_descriptor)(void *p, int seg, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+ void (*set_cached_descriptor)(void *p, int seg, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
u16 (*get_segment_selector)(int seg, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*set_segment_selector)(u16 sel, int seg, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
unsigned long (*get_cached_segment_base)(int seg, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index ad46239..d7d8b63 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -1764,25 +1764,35 @@ static bool emulator_io_port_access_allowed(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
struct x86_emulate_ops *ops,
u16 port, u16 len)
{
- struct desc_struct tr_seg;
+ union {
+ struct desc_struct tss32;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ struct ldttss_desc64 tss64;
+#endif
+ } tr_seg;
int r;
u16 io_bitmap_ptr;
u8 perm, bit_idx = port & 0x7;
unsigned mask = (1 << len) - 1;
+ unsigned long base;
ops->get_cached_descriptor(&tr_seg, VCPU_SREG_TR, ctxt->vcpu);
- if (!tr_seg.p)
+ if (!tr_seg.tss32.p)
return false;
- if (desc_limit_scaled(&tr_seg) < 103)
+ if (desc_limit_scaled(&tr_seg.tss32) < 103)
return false;
- r = ops->read_std(get_desc_base(&tr_seg) + 102, &io_bitmap_ptr, 2,
- ctxt->vcpu, NULL);
+ base = get_desc_base(&tr_seg.tss32);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ if (ctxt->mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64)
+ base |= ((u64)tr_seg.tss64.base3) << 32;
+#endif
+ r = ops->read_std(base + 102, &io_bitmap_ptr, 2, ctxt->vcpu, NULL);
if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
return false;
- if (io_bitmap_ptr + port/8 > desc_limit_scaled(&tr_seg))
+ if (io_bitmap_ptr + port/8 > desc_limit_scaled(&tr_seg.tss32))
return false;
- r = ops->read_std(get_desc_base(&tr_seg) + io_bitmap_ptr + port/8,
- &perm, 1, ctxt->vcpu, NULL);
+ r = ops->read_std(base + io_bitmap_ptr + port/8, &perm, 1, ctxt->vcpu,
+ NULL);
if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
return false;
if ((perm >> bit_idx) & mask)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 785ae0c..e41e098 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4162,11 +4162,12 @@ static unsigned long emulator_get_cached_segment_base(int seg,
return get_segment_base(vcpu, seg);
}
-static bool emulator_get_cached_descriptor(struct desc_struct *desc, int seg,
+static bool emulator_get_cached_descriptor(void *p, int seg,
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_segment var;
-
+ struct desc_struct *desc = p;
+
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &var, seg);
if (var.unusable)
@@ -4185,13 +4186,22 @@ static bool emulator_get_cached_descriptor(struct desc_struct *desc, int seg,
desc->d = var.db;
desc->g = var.g;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ if (seg == VCPU_SREG_TR && is_long_mode(vcpu)) {
+ struct ldttss_desc64 *tss64 = p;
+ tss64->base3 = var.base >> 32;
+ tss64->zero1 = 0;
+ }
+#endif
+
return true;
}
-static void emulator_set_cached_descriptor(struct desc_struct *desc, int seg,
+static void emulator_set_cached_descriptor(void *p, int seg,
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_segment var;
+ struct desc_struct *desc = p;
/* needed to preserve selector */
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &var, seg);
@@ -4211,6 +4221,12 @@ static void emulator_set_cached_descriptor(struct desc_struct *desc, int seg,
var.present = desc->p;
var.unusable = !var.present;
var.padding = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ if (seg == VCPU_SREG_TR && is_long_mode(vcpu)) {
+ struct ldttss_desc64 *tss64 = p;
+ var.base |= ((u64)tss64->base3) << 32;
+ }
+#endif
kvm_set_segment(vcpu, &var, seg);
return;
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-06 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-05 9:40 2.6.38-rc6: general protection error inside KVM 64 bits guest Francis Moreau
2011-03-06 12:42 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2011-03-06 12:55 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-06 14:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-03-06 15:02 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-06 15:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-09 7:05 ` Francis Moreau
2011-03-09 9:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-03-09 9:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-09 9:28 ` Francis Moreau
2011-03-09 9:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-09 9:30 ` Francis Moreau
2011-03-09 9:32 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-03-09 10:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-09 10:07 ` Francis Moreau
2011-05-27 10:22 ` Francis Moreau
2011-05-27 12:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-27 14:30 ` Francis Moreau
2011-03-06 19:36 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110306124238.GC25565@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox