From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Network performance with small packets - continued
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:17:44 +0200
Message-ID: <20110309071744.GA26270@redhat.com>
References: <201103071631.41964.tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Tom Lendacky <tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30376 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753508Ab1CIHRx (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:17:53 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201103071631.41964.tahm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:31:41PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> I used the uperf tool to do this after verifying the results against netperf.  
> Uperf allows the specification of the number of connections as a parameter in 
> an XML file as opposed to launching, in this case, 100 separate instances of 
> netperf.

Could you post the XML on the list please?

-- 
MST