From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc6: general protection error inside KVM 64 bits guest Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:32:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20110309093222.GD10151@redhat.com> References: <20110306124238.GC25565@redhat.com> <4D738435.1030906@redhat.com> <20110306143503.GD25565@redhat.com> <4D73A1EA.1060702@redhat.com> <4D73A368.9040702@redhat.com> <20110309092520.GC10151@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Francis Moreau Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57523 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752169Ab1CIJcZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 04:32:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:30:56AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:05:54AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> > On 03/06/2011 05:02 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> >> > >> >> (for #TS we need additional logic... will this arch never end?) > >> >> > >> > > >> > Actually these instructions don't generate #TS. > >> > > >> > >> I just wanted to know if this issue is going to be fixed before 2.6.38 is out ? > >> > > I posted updated patches. It is up to maintainers to decide if the > > patches should be included in 2.6.38 at such late rc stage. > > > > Would have been nice to CC me since I reported the issue. > Yes, sorry about that. Avi please add Reported-by: to the patch too. -- Gleb.