public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Configuring the bridge interface: why assign an IP?
@ 2011-03-14 17:24 Ben Beuchler
  2011-03-14 17:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Beuchler @ 2011-03-14 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm

Most of the examples for setting up the bridge interface on a VM host
suggest assigning the IP address to the bridge.  Assigning the IP to
the bridge leaves you open to the MAC address of the bridge changing
as you add/remove guests from the host, resulting in a brief (~20
second) loss of connectivity to the host. (I am aware that I can
manually set the MAC of the bridge to avoid unexpected changes. That's
my current workaround.)

Is there a reason why the most common examples all show the IP
assigned to the bridge?  Does that approach provide some functionality
that would be lost otherwise?

I can think of at least two other approaches to configuring the networking:

1) Assign the host's IP to eth0.  Since eth0 is a member of the br0,
it should work just fine.

2) Assign the host's IP to a different NIC entirely.  Say, eth1.
Leave eth0 as a member of br0, but don't assign an IP to the bridge.

Thanks!

-Ben

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-14 17:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-14 17:24 Configuring the bridge interface: why assign an IP? Ben Beuchler
2011-03-14 17:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox